PORTFOLIO | ART| BOOKS| OTHER | CONTACT

2/24/12

Cira Centre, Philadelphia Pennsylvania


Cesar Pelli and Bower Lewis Thrower Architects designed the Cira Center building in the University City district of Philadelphia. It was hoped that the project would rejuvenate the blighted Keystone Opportunity Improvement Zone of the city. But critics say that it has alienated the rest of the city and actually contributed to decay, like the GM Renaissance Center in Detroit.

The skyscraper is situated parallel between the river bank and the 30th Street train station. It tilts to in and up to a point as it gestures toward downtown. The boxed silver glass curtain walls fold in seemingly random ways to establish a monumental form. LEDS shine through the glass at night to punctuate the form.

A pedestrian bridge links the Cira Centre and the train station, though the building still finds itself quite isolated. The sculptural shape gives unique views from any angle it is seen from. The reflective glass further adds to the building's shifting form according to light conditions and helps mask it in the midst of a beautiful neo-classical train station.

Cira Centre was completed in 2005 at a cost of $180 million. It rises 436 feet and was Philadelphia's first large high-rise in over 10 years.

More Info and Images , More Info , More Info and Images









2/18/12

Architecture in the Wizard of Oz: The Tornado

The cyclone that brought Dorothy to the land of Oz had a literal and symbolic meaning in the author's religion Theosophy. Founder Helena Blavatsky told a real-life tale very similar to the whirlwind that brought Dorothy to Oz.

Special people whom she called “human magnets” experienced levitation. They were found floating in the air in “rapturous joy, and with eyes overflowing with tears, congratula[ing] each other upon this new manifestation of the mysterious force.” Author L.F. Baum carefully studied these stories. 1
  • Human Magnets in Theosophy

  • Whirling Progression

  • Evolution of Scarecrow, Tinman, Lion

  • Categories: Lions, Tigers, Bears

  • Pain of Opposites

  • In Russia, a family “descended into the cellar under the house,” just as Aunt Em had escaped from the tornado into the cellar. Then “the whole of the earthenware, cups, tureens and plates, as if snatched from their places by a whirlwind, begin to jump and tremble… the heavy bedstead [was] seen levitating towards the very ceiling.”
    1
    Dorothy slept in her bed while her house levitated into the sky. Uncle Henry ran to the stables in the story, just like “the terrified girls, who escaped within an inch of their lives by violently shutting and locking the door of the stables.” Dorothy “took a basket and filled it full of bread” inside her house, much like the girl in Russia. “In an instant the basket was filled to the brim.”
    a
    These “manifestations… such striking proofs” of levitation were fairly common and they followed a particular pattern.
    “All such phenomena took place not in darness or during night, but in the daytime, and in the full view of the inhabitants of the little hamlet; moreover they were always preceded by an extraordinary noise, as if of a howling wind, a cracking on the walls, and raps in the window-frames and glass.” (H. Blavatsky)1

    The experience was frightening, but in the end the cyclone helped people. Blavatsky said, “…there is nothing whatever of supernatural in the cases,” and that it had the “least possible evil motive.” This was why Dorothy was unafraid during the house’s levitation: “…she stopped worrying and resolved to wait calmly and see what the future would bring.” (15-16) Dorothy even fell peacefully asleep.

    Like the “first-class Spiritistic Star” in Russia who had this experience, she didn’t feel “in the least annoyed.” When the Witch disappeared in a whirlwind Dorothy “was not surprised in the least.” (28) In the film, Dorothy was also a spiritualisc star, labeled “the young lady who fell from a star…”

    “Dorothy did not feel nearly as bad as you might think a little girl would who had been suddenly whisked away from her own country and set down in the midst of a strange land.” (33)

    Whirling to Progression
    “The house whirled around two or three times and rose slowly through the air… The north and south winds met where the house stood, and made it the exact center of the cyclone. In the middle of a cyclone the air is generally still, but the great pressure of the wind on every side of the house raised it up higher and higher, until it was at the very top of the cyclone” (14-15)

    Dorothy's journey was a result of the North (Hapi) and South Imsety) winds meeting. Whirling was a common transportation when two forces met in the land of Oz. The good witches of the north and south whirled two or three times to travel: “The Witch gave Dorothy a friendly little nod, whirled around on her left heel three times, and straightway disappeared…” (28)

    Hoodoo witches would likewise “whirl round on de left heel” as part of the spell of protection: “This whirling-on-the-heel is also a magic rite – of separation, protection, comtempt… it keeps the name (also footspring?) from returning.” 2

    Scarecrow whirled when Lion attacked him at their first meeting: “It astonished me to see him whirl around so” (67) He also whirled in the film.

    Moses called a great wind to open a path through the waters of the Red Sea. In much the same way, the wind carried Dorothy across the red desert to the land of Oz. It was a whirling of separation, divine protection, and contempt. Dorothy remarked “I can’t go back the way I came.”

    Communism and other social movements of Baum’s day often used the theme of upward progression from a spiral or whirlwind. 3

    The theme first got its origin from Egypt. Ancient Egyptians believed that the deceased “assumes the powerof the bennu-bird, or the shen-shen, both of which ascend the air to a great height in a spiral whirls. The deceased character prayed that he may ‘wheel round in whirls’ and circle heavenward with the spiral motion of the bennu, i.e., the typical phoenix.” 4

    This was the astral body (Ka) leaving the physical body post-death, to be glorified by the sun (Ba), and finally reunited with the physical body when the breathing rituals were completed (Akh, the bird).

    “Birds fly over the rainbow; why then, oh why can’t I?” This spiral upward motion occurred at the presence of the new light, the unmanifest logos. It represented the personal manifestation of Dorothy's logos, but was also the macrocasm of human progression.
    “Now every "Round" (on the descending scale) is but a repetition in a more concrete form of the Round which preceded it… On its way upwards on the ascending arc, Evolution spiritualises and etherealises, so to speak, the general nature of all… when the seventh globe is reached (in whatever Round) the nature of everything that is evolving returns to the condition it was in at its starting point— plus, every time, a new and superior degree in the states of consciousness.” (H. Blavatsky)5

    The primitive hut evolved into a higher form of spirituality, until Dorothy at last reached the palace of her actualized self. The spiritual forces of the north and south met to raise her toward rebirth.

    Evolution of Scarecrow, Tinman, and Lion

    Dorothy’s friends represented the evolution of Dorothy toward rebirth. They represented the three kingdoms of nature in Theosophy which she must pass through. The Tinman was the mineral, Scarecrow was the vegetable, and Lion was the animal:
    “Therefore Nature (in man) must become a compound of Spirit and Matter before he becomes what he is; and the Spirit latent in Matter must be awakened to life and conciousness gradually. The Monad has to pass through its mineral, vegetable, and animal forms, before the Light of the Logos is awakened in the animal man.” (H. Blavatsky)6

    Dorothy’s passage in Oz referenced these three categories of universal evolution, and the seven days of creation: “…taking the dog in her arms, [Dorothy] followed the green girl through seven passages and up three flights of stairs until they came to a room at the front of the Palace.” (124)
    Each of her three friends sought spiritual attributes that were necessary to navigate the afterlife. Blavatsky taught the necessity of these three virtues along the golden path:
    “There is a road, steep and thorny, beset with perils of every kind, but yet a road, and it leads to the very heart of the Universe… There is no danger that dauntless courage cannot conquer; there is no trial that spotless purity cannot pass through; there is no difficulty that strong intellect cannot surmount. For those who win onwards, there is reward past all telling—the power to bless and save humanity…”7

    Blavatsky’s order of virtues was the same as in Oz— courage, heart, and brains. Her Hindu source for this Theosophical teaching called it a linear evolution, a particular order. The Hindu teaching of Swami Vivekananda had Four Yogas:
    • (Return home)- Royal union or liberation

    • (Courage)- Discipline of action

    • (Heart)- Loving devotion to a personal God

    • (Brain)- Path of knowledge

    A person moved up one Yoga to the next. Tinman had a brain but could not feel, and the Lion had a heart and a brain but not courage. Each one was a step forward.

    Each considered their missing attribute the key to their enlightenment:
    “If you only had brains in your head you would be as good a man as any of them, and a better man than some of them. Brains are the only things worth having in this world, no matter whether one is a crow or a man.” (47)

    “I shall take the heart… for brains do not make one happy, and happiness is the best thing in the world.”(61)

    “…my life is simply unbearable without a bit of courage... as long as I know myself to be a coward I shall be unhappy.” (70)

    “…she decided if she could only get back to Kansas and Aunt Em it did not matter so much whether the Woodman had no brains and the Scarecrow no heart, or each got what he wanted.” (61)

    Categories of Evolution

    The four heroes represented the four kingdoms of the world: animal, vegetable, mineral, human.

    Each was afraid of a corresponding natural element: fire (Scarecrow), water (Tin man), air (Dorothy), and earth (Lion). When he was cured, “The Lion declared he was afraid of nothing on earth” (203)

    The four kingdoms of creation in Egyptian religion mirrored the four cardinal directions of the earth. 12 The Egyptian Book of Gates described how God plotted out the vareities of life.
    “Atum (Re in his setting-sun aspect) leans on a staff over four prone figures called the Tired Ones… in all three registers, long processions of deities are engaged in activities connected with measuring, allotting, and apportioning…

    Horus addresses a procession of sixteen figures made up of four groups of four. Each group represents one of the four races of mankind as the Egyptians knew them: Men (Egyptians), Asiatics, Negroes, and Libyans....

    This concept, offered without the slightest clue to its provocation, finds a measure of corroboration in the works of the twentieth-century Russian mystic and philospher G.I. Gurdjieff.” 13

    Four main categories of humans likewise appeared in the Wizard of Oz: Munckins, the people of Oz and Glinda, Winkies, and Flying Monkeys.

    Lion gathered all the animals of the land, as king of the animals, much like the bibical gathering of animals by Noah. “…were gathered hundreds of beasts of every variety. There were tigers and elephants and bears and wolves and foxes and all the others in the natural history…” (238)

    These categories of animals as listed were taken straight from Theosophy’s “differentiation of the animal life.”b

    Theosophists categorized the animal kingdom by canines, felines, etc like a tree. The different races and species of life “shot out like the boughs of a tree from the first central group of the four, and shoot out in their turn numberless side groups.” 14

    They categorized life into seven categories, from the least to the most evolved.
    “Theosophy recognizes seven kingdoms, because it regards man as separate from the animal kingdom and it takes into account several stages of evolution which are unseen by the physical eye, and gives to them the mediaeval name of “elemental kingdoms.” 15

    Blavatsky claimed that this teaching came straight from ancient Egypt.

    The same principle applied to the solar system: “’Seven Luminous Ones’ accompany Osiris-Sun” on his journey to rebirth, the seven planets who are also the “seven angels of the Presence.” 16 Galileo’s observation of seven notes in the musical scale and seven colors in the spectrum led to the popular idea that seven was the magical number of creation.

    Lion considered himself just another category of animals before becoming King of the Beasts.
    “All the other animals in the forest naturally expect me to be brave, for the Lion is everywhere thought to be the King of the Beasts… If the elephants and the tigers and the bears had ever tried to fight me, I should have run myself…” (68)

    The film changed this order of beasts which reside in the forest: Lions, Tigers, and Bears.

    The book mentioned the horse as a synonym for the Lion. Dorothy thought the Cowardly Lion was “as big as a small horse.” (68) The Witch repeatedly tried to harness him like a horse (147,150,151), and he complained of getting fed porridge which was “food for horses, not lions.” (115) The elephant and horse therefore can be added to the list of beasts.

    The book presented these animals in order of largest to smallest, which also was thought to be the order of geographic location from the South to the North: Elephant, Lion, Tiger, Bear, Horse. This particular list of beasts was very significant to ancient Mesopotamia, and trickles down to the racial supremacist teachings of Vitruvius.

    Theosophy quoted the ancient Hindu Brahamana to get a similar list.
    “Elephants, horses, Sudras [the lowest caste in Hinduism], and despicable barbarians, lions, tigers, and boars are the middling states caused by the quality of darkness.” 17

    This Hindu list of beasts came all the way from ancient Egypt:
    The symbolism of the Master of Animals is usually understood in the context of a world where people were still competing for resources with animals on a daily basis.

    In Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley lions, tigers and bears presented very real threats to small populations that were still reliant on hunting and fishing to subsidize their diets.” 18

    A similar list appeared in the ancient Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh: “I killed bear, hyena, lion, panther, tiger, stag, red-stag, and beasts of the wilderness.” 19

    Stag in this passage was synonymous with horse, as revealed earlier in the tale: “Oh, Enkidu, whose own mother’s grace was every bit as sweet as any deer’s and whose father raced just as swift and stood as strong as any horse that ever ran.” (Tablet VIII)

    “As mythical symbols, the Horse and the Stag both represent the birth of the sun… The Stag is, in many respects, a very similar symbol to the Horse; it too has an age-old association to the sun and fire, and like the horse’s mane the stag’s horns also represent rays of the sunlight.” 20

    This reveals that Lion also represented the journey of the sun at Springtime, like the fiery phoenix of the Egyptian resurrection, another kind of whirlwind. Lion was an Egyptian phoenix of courage. The cover illustration of Wizard of Oz portrayed lion as the phoenix, the beast of resurrection.
    “The cult of the Lion was also very ancient in Eygpt, and it seems to have been tolerably widespread in early dynastic times; the animal was worshipped on account of his great strength and courage, and was usually associated with the Sun-god, Horus or Ra…” 21


    Pain of Opposites

    In the ephemeral Theosophic vision of color, the inititate discovered a two-edged sword of sacred truth. Each evolution brought both a blessing and a curse:
    “Then he cried out ‘Is there always to be pain!’ and the answer came softly, softly, ‘Yea, until the lesson is learned.’

    He wept bitterly but through his tears came a great strength, and by and by he understood.” 8

    Knowledge brought both the bitter and the sweet. The spoken Truth “compels the significance of the respective poles, since negativity and posititivity require an underlying concept of opposition/affinity in order to render them meaningful.” 9
    Scarecrow received sensibility to discern truth, which gave him pleasure but also pain:
    “I don’t mind my legs and arms and body being stuffed, because I cannot get hurt. If anyone treads on my toes or sticks a pin into me, it doesn’t matter, for I can’t feel it. But I do not want people to call me a fool, and if my head stays stuffed with straw instead of with brains, as yours is, how am I ever to know anything?” (39)

    The Tinman had once had a heart but lost it, because man can get hurt with the fruit of knowledge. Lost love is painful and disarming. “Hearts will never be practical until they can be made unbreakable.”

    Lion’s case of opposition was a specific allusion to Pharoah’s kingship. The Pharoah used imagery of a lion to illustrate his superior rule: “… a lion pouncing upon his prey and destroying it without mercy- an image of ruthless savagery was to become a regular of Hittite power.” 10
    “For of old the Land of Hatti with the help of the Sun Goddess of Arinna used to rage against the surrounding lands like a lion.” 11

    Pharoah didn’t want to be an oppressor of the weak, just like Lion was wary of offending small animals. Great power can so easily be misused.

    Sensibility brings physical pain, love brings bitterness, and power corrupts. As America rose to superpower, each case of increased virtue brought a personal vice and a social fear.

    ^Theosophy Company, Theosophy, Vol. 6, (Los Angeles, The United Lodge of Theosophists, 1917-1918), 38, 35-42

    ^Hyatt Harry Middleton, Hoodoo—conjuration—witchcraft—rootwork…, (Washington: Western Pub., 1978), 3245

    ^see for example August Bebel, Women under socialism, (NY: New York Labor News Press, 1904), iv

    ^Gerald Massey, Ancient Egypt - The Light of the World… 1, (London: T. Fisher Unwin), 331

    ^Blatavsky, The Secret Doctrine: Cosmogenesis, 232

    ^H.P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine: Anthopogenesis, vol. 2, (Point Loma: Aryan Theosophical Press., 1888), 42

    ^H.P. Blavatsky, Boris De Zirkoff, Collected Writings: 1890-1891, (USA: Theosophical Pub. House, 1966)102

    ^Cavé, “In a Temple,” Theosophy, Vol. 12 issues 1-7, 24

    ^John Anthony West, Serpent in the sky: the high wisdom of ancient Egypt, (Illinois: Theosophical Publishing House, Quest Books 1993), 69

    ^Trevor Bryce, The Kindom of the Hittites, (USA: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005), 87

    ^Bryce, The Kindom of the Hittites, 204

    ^see Plongeon, Queen M'oo and the Egyptian sphinx, 217

    ^West, The traveler's key to ancient Egypt: a guide...,  299-300

    ^Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1, 221

    ^C.W. Leadbeater, A Textbook of Theosophy, (Los Angeles: Theosophical Pub. House, 1918), 10

    ^H.P. Blavatsky, Psychology of Ancient Egypt, (Paris: Le Lotus, 1888), 56

    ^Max Muller, The sacred books of the East, vol.25, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1886), 163

    ^Robert McRoberts, Unlocking The Secrets of Ancient Iconography, www.suite101.com..., (4/12/11)

    ^Epic of Gilgamesh, Tablet X

    ^Gavin White, Babylonian Star-lore: An illustrated guide…, (Lulu, 2007), 36

    ^E.A. Wallis Budge, The gods of the Egyptians: or, Studies in Egyptian mythology, vol.2, (London: Methuen & co., 1904) , 359-360

    ^E.A. Wallis Budge, The gods of the Egyptians: or, Studies in Egyptian mythology, vol.2, (London: Methuen & co., 1904) , 359-360

    ^Image from R. Machell, “Tried in the balance,” The theosophical path, 13 (1918) 413-420 which author L. Frank Baum probably was influenced by.

    ^Images from: Curuppumullage Jinarajadasa, First Principles of Theosophy, (reprint, Montana: KessingerPub., 1995), 14, 119

    2/4/12

    Vernacular and High Style Architecture

    Architecure uses three basic values: function, structure, aesthetics. These values interact in different qualities to form two categories of styles: Vernacular and High Style architecture.

    Ohringen

    [a]

    Vernacular architecture suites the basic functions of living and working. Structure is highly adaptive to these needs and the context of the site. It is for the people, of the people, and by the people. Local citizens use local materials and natural solutions to shield against climate and other needs.

    There will be cultural influences, such as Tipi designs or plazas of cobble stones. Local materials are frequently used, giving the entire community physical identity in the architecture.

    Defense against attack is an issue that throughout history has united the community against hostile outside influences. Economics and trade are addressed in market places and business spaces. Old European cities were situated close together for increased safety and better social and economic interaction. There is great similarity and identity in materials and style in the Vernacular of these communities.

    Ohringen

    [b]

    The High Style by contrast suits cultural needs of aesthetics and politics, relying less on utilitarianism. It is for the elite, for the institutional, and flashy trends in a culture. High style is commissioned by large organizations and often not a local effort. High quality materials are used without the community context in mind, and functionalism is less important.

    An example is the pyramids in Egypt, which though the most impressive structures ever made, serve no utilitarian purpose. They are purely religious and political structures, built to display the power and religion of the pharaoh. Religion and government have historically been a major influence in this style. Museums and corporate needs have of late become major influences.

    Speculative architecture, integrated architecture, and sustainable architecture are other styles within either Vernacular or High Style.

    Speculative architecture is achieved by the developer for economic profit. These are often unsuccessful and shortsighted projects that get torn down in 50 years. Integrated architecture participatory design that involves the entire community in the design process. It responds to needs of people individually and collectively, as well as the environment. But it requires a well educated public. Sustainable architecture responds to all needs in a long term way, making it the most successful architecture.

    Today's "sustainable" architecture is almost never really sustainable. A living roof and a couple solar panels does not make a building sustainable.

    Ohringen

    [c]

    All positive aspects of both Vernacular and High styles may be incorporated into these sub-categories, while economically sound reasoning may be used and the needs of the people met. The edifice shouldn't impede on the aesthetics of the environment or on other positive environmental influences.

    Modern architecture is moving to High Style. Our supposedly increased democracy should result in more Vernacular, one would think, but really the opposite is the case. All functions, from residential to governmental, are increasingly speculative and removed from local contexts. Non-functional needs take precedence and we are left with a hollow gesture toward upper class aesthetics. Like Heinrich Hübsch, we are left asking, "In which style should we build?"

    Image credits:

    ^roger4336- flickr/cc license

    ^maltman23- flickr/cc license

    ^fyunkie- flickr/cc license

    2/3/12

    University of Phoenix Cardinals Stadium, Arizona


    Peter Eisenman Architects and HOK designed the University of Phoenix Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. It was completed in 2006.

    The soft rolling form is inspired from a barrel cactus and is divided into 22 sections by vertical slits. These slits of glazing interrupt the metal panels that make up the exterior sheen. Each of these metal metals had to be chamfered to round out the overall form. A thick canvas material bubbles above to cover the structure inside.

    The retractable roof is clear of all structure, unlike the Dallas Cowboys stadium, which is possible because of enormous girders running longitudinally above the field. It is quite a span.

    But apparently that doesn't provide enough sunlight for the natural turf, for which the stadium has a complete retractable side and rolling field that can be rolled outside of the stadium. It can rotate the field or just replace it with something else temporarily. This feature ate up much of the $455 million construction cost. At 63,400 seats, it accommodates quite a crowd for any event.

    More Info and Images , Review
    Video: Documentary










    2/1/12

    Central Concert Hall, Astana Kazakhstan


    Manfredi Nicoletti designed the Central Concert Hall near the the Ak Orda Presidential Palace in Astana, the capital city of Kazakhstan. It was completed in 2009.

    The city airport and University Humanities Building offer an unusual blue circular shape that is for some reason prevalent. The glass panels take on a much more dynamic form at the concert hall, breaking up into twisting shards and displaying horizontal streaks. The shards open up to give entrances and glazed sections for daylight.

    The overall site is a rectangle of urban park within three aligned piazzas. The concert is intended to open like a flower next to the Presidential Palace and Senate. This vision of bulbous motion continues inside. The music establishes an envelope of space.

    The 3,500 seat auditorium is surrounded by restaurants, exhibition halls, gathering spaces, theaters, and shops. A large flexibility in music styles is permitted because of acoustic curtains that can move and absorb a large amount of sound.

    More Images , More Info , More Info and Images



    Airport:


    Humanities Building at University:

    1/28/12

    The Golden Mean Gives Form and Distance In Space

    The Golden Proportion is not just a mysterious number. The reason why this proportion is aesthetically pleasing has been known for ages. It mathematically unites objects into a grid and clarifies to the mind the object's mass and distance.

    Very simple mathematical reasoning allows us to see how the golden mean lets us know whether objects are far away or small. An environment that conforms to the golden mean helps the brain figure this out quicker.

    Mass and Distance have a Linear Relationship

    Imagine you are looking at two telephone poles on the skyline. You can't tell how far away they are but it looks like they are the same size. So you jump really high in the air and take a look at them from a different point of view. You realize that one of them is much farther away than the other one, but it is also much larger so that made it look closer.

    Things look bigger when they are closer to you. This simple fact provides the basis for relationships of all objects in space. Mass=1/distance. The greater the distance to an object, the smaller the mass of the object appears.

    But we can't tell whether a singular object is far away or if it just small. From our point of view it is the same thing. We need a third object to reference and judge against. Maybe a line of telephone poles that are the same size.

    With enough objects in space that relate to each others' masses and distances, we can know how mass and distance relate- mass gets smaller as distance gets greater. Each pole's top and bottom are parallel and converge on a vanishing point. It is a linear relationship

    The perceived distance between poles is D=x-1 where x is the length of the previous distance between the closer poles. The Length of the entire perceived row of poles is the sum of each space: L=∑(x+1)/i where i is the distance between you and the first pole.

    Harmonic Series Gives Form

    Now let's keep throwing telephone poles in there at random. After a while there are so many telephone poles that you can't see through to the other side, all you see is telephone poles. The point at which this happens is the very instant these telephone poles become an object, a single unit in space.

    At what point does this occur? It depends on the distance between poles and the size of the poles.

    The harmonic series tells you at what rate you can add smaller pieces of a pie to make the entire pie. The poles get smaller at a linear rate, remember, as they get farther away. With the harmonic series, all the poles a distance of 1 away from you will add up to a mass of 1/4; all the poles a distance of 2 will add up to a mass of 1/9; and so forth. If you keep going, all the poles together will add up to a mass of 1.

    It is a very simple rate: 1/k². This is also the rate at which light gets dimmer through space.

    Harmic Series and Linear Series Prove Golden Mean

    What happens when we make these two equations equal to each other: 1/x² = 1/(x+1)?

    The rate at which mass gets smaller in distance is equal to the rate at which smaller parts make up a whole. There is only one number that x can equal: 1.618 or the golden mean.

    The golden mean gives a relationship between distance and mass that lets the viewer determine if objects are either small or far away. If the objects fit into this proportion there is no question.



    This can also be demonstrated geometrically. If the viewer is a distance of 1 away from the first telephone pole and the pole is 1 in size, all you need to do is space the second pole 1.618 away and it will appear to you 1/1.618 in size. Or you can make the second pole 1.618 in size, space it 1 away, and it will appear 1 in size.


    Golden Mean Allows Quantum Physics

    The Quantum theory states that there is a definite size that relates all energy in the universe. Energy and matter can be broken down to a basic size and no further.

    Our original problem of things getting smaller as distance gets greater therefore isn't such a big problem. On a quantum level the golden mean can let us know the distance between everything, as all energy is made up of the same units. Furthermore, we know that there is a finite distance that can be reached between two objects in space.

    Think of the telephone poles as quantum units of energy and distance as the momentum that separates those energies from the observer.

    Parmenides contended that space doesn't really exist if there is nothing in it and that motion or multiplicity therefore doesn't exist. The ability of energy to travel between states is what gives us what looks like space. The golden mean is a standard that the space appears as, according to the mass of the energies being perceived.

    Copyright Benjamin Blankenbehler